Skip to main content

Calculus III - 3-Dimensional Space: Equations of Lines

In this section we need to take a look at the equation of a line in  R 3 R 3 . As we saw in the previous section the equation  y = m x + b y = m x + b  does not describe a line in  R 3 R 3 , instead it describes a plane. This doesn’t mean however that we can’t write down an equation for a line in 3-D space. We’re just going to need a new way of writing down the equation of a curve. So, before we get into the equations of lines we first need to briefly look at vector functions. We’re going to take a more in depth look at vector functions later. At this point all that we need to worry about is notational issues and how they can be used to give the equation of a curve. The best way to get an idea of what a vector function is and what its graph looks like is to look at an example. So, consider the following vector function. → r ( t ) = ⟨ t , 1 ⟩ r → ( t ) = ⟨ t , 1 ⟩ A vector function is a function that takes one or more variables, one in this case, and returns a vector. Note as we

Differential Equations - First Order: Separable Equations - i




Separable Equations

We are now going to start looking at nonlinear first order differential equations. The first type of nonlinear first order differential equations that we will look at is separable differential equations.

A separable differential equation is any differential equation that we can write in the following form.
(1)N(y)dydx=M(x)
Note that in order for a differential equation to be separable all the y's in the differential equation must be multiplied by the derivative and all the x's in the differential equation must be on the other side of the equal sign.
To solve this differential equation we first integrate both sides with respect to x to get,
N(y)dydxdx=M(x)dx
Now, remember that y is really y(x) and so we can use the following substitution,
u=y(x)du=y(x)dx=dydxdx
Applying this substitution to the integral we get,
(2)N(u)du=M(x)dx
At this point we can (hopefully) integrate both sides and then back substitute for the u on the left side. Note, that as implied in the previous sentence, it might not actually be possible to evaluate one or both of the integrals at this point. If that is the case, then there won’t be a lot we can do to proceed using this method to solve the differential equation.
Now, the process above is the mathematically correct way of doing solving this differential equation. Note however, that if we “separate” the derivative as well we can write the differential equation as,
N(y)dy=M(x)dx
We obviously can’t separate the derivative like that, but let’s pretend we can for a bit and we’ll see that we arrive at the answer with less work.
Now we integrate both sides of this to get,
(3)N(y)dy=M(x)dx
So, if we compare (2) and (3) we can see that the only difference is on the left side and even then the only real difference is (2) has the integral in terms of u and (3) has the integral in terms of y. Outside of that there is no real difference. The integral on the left is exactly the same integral in each equation. The only difference is the letter used in the integral. If we integrate (2) and then back substitute in for u we would arrive at the same thing as if we’d just integrated (3) from the start.

Therefore, to make the work go a little easier, we’ll just use (3) to find the solution to the differential equation. Also, after doing the integrations, we will have an implicit solution that we can hopefully solve for the explicit solution, y(x). Note that it won't always be possible to solve for an explicit solution.

Recall from the Definitions section that an implicit solution is a solution that is not in the form y=y(x) while an explicit solution has been written in that form.
We will also have to worry about the interval of validity for many of these solutions. Recall that the interval of validity was the range of the independent variable, x in this case, on which the solution is valid. In other words, we need to avoid division by zero, complex numbers, logarithms of negative numbers or zero, etc. Most of the solutions that we will get from separable differential equations will not be valid for all values of x.
Let’s start things off with a fairly simple example so we can see the process without getting lost in details of the other issues that often arise with these problems.


Example 1 Solve the following differential equation and determine the interval of validity for the solution.dydx=6y2xy(1)=125


It is clear, hopefully, that this differential equation is separable. So, let’s separate the differential equation and integrate both sides. As with the linear first order officially we will pick up a constant of integration on both sides from the integrals on each side of the equal sign. The two can be moved to the same side and absorbed into each other. We will use the convention that puts the single constant on the side with the x’s given that we will eventually be solving for y and so the constant would end up on that side anyway.
y2dy=6xdxy2dy=6xdx1y=3x2+cSo, we now have an implicit solution. This solution is easy enough to get an explicit solution, however before getting that it is usually easier to find the value of the constant at this point. So apply the initial condition and find the value of c.
11/25=3(1)2+cc=28Plug this into the general solution and then solve to get an explicit solution.
1y=3x228y(x)=1283x2Now, as far as solutions go we’ve got the solution. We do need to start worrying about intervals of validity however.
Recall that there are two conditions that define an interval of validity. First, it must be a continuous interval with no breaks or holes in it. Second it must contain the value of the independent variable in the initial condition, x = 1 in this case.
So, for our case we’ve got to avoid two values of x. Namely, x±283±3.05505 since these will give us division by zero. This gives us three possible intervals of validity.
<x<283283<x<283283<x<However, only one of these will contain the value of x from the initial condition and so we can see that
283<x<283must be the interval of validity for this solution.
Here is a graph of the solution.
Note that this does not say that either of the other two intervals listed above can’t be the interval of validity for any solution to the differential equation. With the proper initial condition either of these could have been the interval of validity.
We’ll leave it to you to verify the details of the following claims. If we use an initial condition of
y(4)=120we will get exactly the same solution however in this case the interval of validity would be the first one.
<x<283Likewise, if we use
y(6)=180as the initial condition we again get exactly the same solution and, in this case, the third interval becomes the interval of validity.
283<x<So, simply changing the initial condition a little can give any of the possible intervals.


Example 2 Solve the following IVP and find the interval of validity for the solution.y=3x2+4x42y4y(1)=3


This differential equation is clearly separable, so let's put it in the proper form and then integrate both sides.
(2y4)dy=(3x2+4x4)dx(2y4)dy=(3x2+4x4)dxy24y=x3+2x24x+cWe now have our implicit solution, so as with the first example let’s apply the initial condition at this point to determine the value of c.
(3)24(3)=(1)3+2(1)24(1)+cc=2The implicit solution is then
y24y=x3+2x24x2We now need to find the explicit solution. This is actually easier than it might look and you already know how to do it. First, we need to rewrite the solution a little
y24y(x3+2x24x2)=0To solve this all we need to recognize is that this is quadratic in y and so we can use the quadratic formula to solve it. However, unlike quadratics you are used to, at least some of the “constants” will not actually be constant but will in fact involve x’s.
So, upon using the quadratic formula on this we get.
y(x)=4±164(1)((x3+2x24x2))2=4±16+4(x3+2x24x2)2Next, notice that we can factor a 4 out from under the square root (it will come out as a 2…) and then simplify a little.
y(x)=4±24+(x3+2x24x2)2=2±x3+2x24x+2We are almost there. Notice that we’ve actually got two solutions here (the “±”) and we only want a single solution. In fact, only one of the signs can be correct. So, to figure out which one is correct we can reapply the initial condition to this. Only one of the signs will give the correct value so we can use this to figure out which one of the signs is correct. Plugging x = 1 into the solution gives.
3=y(1)=2±1+24+2=2±1=3,1In this case it looks like the “+” is the correct sign for our solution. Note that it is completely possible that the “–” could be the solution (i.e. using an initial condition of y(1)=1) so don’t always expect it to be one or the other.
The explicit solution for our differential equation is.
y(x)=2+x3+2x24x+2To finish the example out we need to determine the interval of validity for the solution. If we were to put a large negative value of x in the solution we would end up with complex values in our solution and we want to avoid complex numbers in our solutions here. So, we will need to determine which values of x will give real solutions. To do this we will need to solve the following inequality.
x3+2x24x+20In other words, we need to make sure that the quantity under the radical stays positive.
Using a computer algebra system like Maple or Mathematica we see that the left side is zero at x = –3.36523 as well as two complex values, but we can ignore complex values for interval of validity computations. Finally, a graph of the quantity under the radical is shown below.
So, in order to get real solutions we will need to require x3.36523 because this is the range of x’s for which the quantity is positive. Notice as well that this interval also contains the value of x that is in the initial condition as it should.
Therefore, the interval of validity of the solution is x3.36523 .
Here is graph of the solution.


Example 3 Solve the following IVP and find the interval of validity of the solution.y=xy31+x2y(0)=1


First separate and then integrate both sides.
y3dy=x(1+x2)12dxy3dy=x(1+x2)12dx12y2=1+x2+cApply the initial condition to get the value of c.
12=1+cc=32The implicit solution is then,
12y2=1+x232Now let’s solve for y(x).
1y2=321+x2y2=1321+x2y(x)=±1321+x2Reapplying the initial condition shows us that the “–” is the correct sign. The explicit solution is then,
y(x)=1321+x2Let’s get the interval of validity. That’s easier than it might look for this problem. First, since 1+x20 the “inner” root will not be a problem. Therefore, all we need to worry about is division by zero and negatives under the “outer” root. We can take care of both by requiring
321+x2>03>21+x29>4(1+x2)94>1+x254>x2Note that we were able to square both sides of the inequality because both sides of the inequality are guaranteed to be positive in this case. Finally solving for x we see that the only possible range of x’s that will not give division by zero or square roots of negative numbers will be,
52<x<52and nicely enough this also contains the initial condition x=0. This interval is therefore our interval of validity.
Here is a graph of the solution.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Digital Signal Processing - Basic Continuous Time Signals

To test a system, generally, standard or basic signals are used. These signals are the basic building blocks for many complex signals. Hence, they play a very important role in the study of signals and systems. Unit Impulse or Delta Function A signal, which satisfies the condition,   δ ( t ) = lim ϵ → ∞ x ( t ) δ ( t ) = lim ϵ → ∞ x ( t )   is known as unit impulse signal. This signal tends to infinity when t = 0 and tends to zero when t ≠ 0 such that the area under its curve is always equals to one. The delta function has zero amplitude everywhere except at t = 0. Properties of Unit Impulse Signal δ(t) is an even signal. δ(t) is an example of neither energy nor power (NENP) signal. Area of unit impulse signal can be written as; A = ∫ ∞ − ∞ δ ( t ) d t = ∫ ∞ − ∞ lim ϵ → 0 x ( t ) d t = lim ϵ → 0 ∫ ∞ − ∞ [ x ( t ) d t ] = 1 Weight or strength of the signal can be written as; y ( t ) = A δ ( t ) y ( t ) = A δ ( t ) Area of the weighted impulse signal can

Differential Equations - First Order: Bernoulli

In this section we are going to take a look at differential equations in the form, y ′ + p ( x ) y = q ( x ) y n y ′ + p ( x ) y = q ( x ) y n where  p ( x ) p ( x )  and  q ( x ) q ( x )  are continuous functions on the interval we’re working on and  n n  is a real number. Differential equations in this form are called  Bernoulli Equations . First notice that if  n = 0 n = 0  or  n = 1 n = 1  then the equation is linear and we already know how to solve it in these cases. Therefore, in this section we’re going to be looking at solutions for values of  n n  other than these two. In order to solve these we’ll first divide the differential equation by  y n y n  to get, y − n y ′ + p ( x ) y 1 − n = q ( x ) y − n y ′ + p ( x ) y 1 − n = q ( x ) We are now going to use the substitution  v = y 1 − n v = y 1 − n  to convert this into a differential equation in terms of  v v . As we’ll see this will lead to a differential equation that we can solve. We are going to have to be c

Differential Equations - Systems: Solutions

Now that we’ve got some of the basics out of the way for systems of differential equations it’s time to start thinking about how to solve a system of differential equations. We will start with the homogeneous system written in matrix form, → x ′ = A → x (1) (1) x → ′ = A x → where,  A A  is an  n × n n × n  matrix and  → x x →  is a vector whose components are the unknown functions in the system. Now, if we start with  n = 1 n = 1 then the system reduces to a fairly simple linear (or separable) first order differential equation. x ′ = a x x ′ = a x and this has the following solution, x ( t ) = c e a t x ( t ) = c e a t So, let’s use this as a guide and for a general  n n  let’s see if → x ( t ) = → η e r t (2) (2) x → ( t ) = η → e r t will be a solution. Note that the only real difference here is that we let the constant in front of the exponential be a vector. All we need to do then is plug this into the differential equation and see what we get. First notice that

Calculus III - 3-Dimensional Space: Equations of Lines

In this section we need to take a look at the equation of a line in  R 3 R 3 . As we saw in the previous section the equation  y = m x + b y = m x + b  does not describe a line in  R 3 R 3 , instead it describes a plane. This doesn’t mean however that we can’t write down an equation for a line in 3-D space. We’re just going to need a new way of writing down the equation of a curve. So, before we get into the equations of lines we first need to briefly look at vector functions. We’re going to take a more in depth look at vector functions later. At this point all that we need to worry about is notational issues and how they can be used to give the equation of a curve. The best way to get an idea of what a vector function is and what its graph looks like is to look at an example. So, consider the following vector function. → r ( t ) = ⟨ t , 1 ⟩ r → ( t ) = ⟨ t , 1 ⟩ A vector function is a function that takes one or more variables, one in this case, and returns a vector. Note as we

Digital Signal Processing - Miscellaneous Signals

There are other signals, which are a result of operation performed on them. Some common type of signals are discussed below. Conjugate Signals Signals, which satisfies the condition  x ( t ) = x ∗ ( − t ) are called conjugate signals. Let  x ( t ) = a ( t ) + j b ( t ) So,  x ( − t ) = a ( − t ) + j b ( − t ) And  x ∗ ( − t ) = a ( − t ) − j b ( − t ) By Condition,  x ( t ) = x ∗ ( − t ) If we compare both the derived equations 1 and 2, we can see that the real part is even, whereas the imaginary part is odd. This is the condition for a signal to be a conjugate type. Conjugate Anti-Symmetric Signals Signals, which satisfy the condition  x ( t ) = − x ∗ ( − t ) are called conjugate anti-symmetric signal Let  x ( t ) = a ( t ) + j b ( t ) So  x ( − t ) = a ( − t ) + j b ( − t ) And  x ∗ ( − t ) = a ( − t ) − j b ( − t ) − x ∗ ( − t ) = − a ( − t ) + j b ( − t ) By Condition  x ( t ) = − x ∗ ( − t ) Now, again compare, both the equations just as w

Differential Equations - First Order: Modeling - i

We now move into one of the main applications of differential equations both in this class and in general. Modeling is the process of writing a differential equation to describe a physical situation. Almost all of the differential equations that you will use in your job (for the engineers out there in the audience) are there because somebody, at some time, modeled a situation to come up with the differential equation that you are using. This section is not intended to completely teach you how to go about modeling all physical situations. A whole course could be devoted to the subject of modeling and still not cover everything! This section is designed to introduce you to the process of modeling and show you what is involved in modeling. We will look at three different situations in this section : Mixing Problems, Population Problems, and Falling Objects. In all of these situations we will be forced to make assumptions that do not accurately depict reality in most cases, but wi

Differential Equations - Basic Concepts: Definitions

Differential Equation The first definition that we should cover should be that of  differential equation . A differential equation is any equation which contains derivatives, either ordinary derivatives or partial derivatives. There is one differential equation that everybody probably knows, that is Newton’s Second Law of Motion. If an object of mass  m m  is moving with acceleration  a a  and being acted on with force  F F  then Newton’s Second Law tells us. F = m a (1) (1) F = m a To see that this is in fact a differential equation we need to rewrite it a little. First, remember that we can rewrite the acceleration,  a a , in one of two ways. a = d v d t OR a = d 2 u d t 2 (2) (2) a = d v d t OR a = d 2 u d t 2 Where  v v  is the velocity of the object and  u u  is the position function of the object at any time  t t . We should also remember at this point that the force,  F F  may also be a function of time, velocity, and/or position. So, with all these things in

Differential Equations - Partial: Summary of Separation of Variables

Throughout this chapter we’ve been talking about and solving partial differential equations using the method of separation of variables. However, the one thing that we’ve not really done is completely work an example from start to finish showing each and every step. Each partial differential equation that we solved made use somewhere of the fact that we’d done at least part of the problem in another section and so it makes some sense to have a quick summary of the method here. Also note that each of the partial differential equations only involved two variables. The method can often be extended out to more than two variables, but the work in those problems can be quite involved and so we didn’t cover any of that here. So with all of that out of the way here is a quick summary of the method of separation of variables for partial differential equations in two variables. Verify that the partial differential equation is linear and homogeneous. Verify that the boundary condi

Differential Equations - Systems: Repeated Eigenvalues - i

This is the final case that we need to take a look at. In this section we are going to look at solutions to the system, → x ′ = A → x x → ′ = A x → where the eigenvalues are repeated eigenvalues. Since we are going to be working with systems in which  A A  is a  2 × 2 2 × 2  matrix we will make that assumption from the start. So, the system will have a double eigenvalue,  λ λ . This presents us with a problem. We want two linearly independent solutions so that we can form a general solution. However, with a double eigenvalue we will have only one, → x 1 = → η e λ t x → 1 = η → e λ t So, we need to come up with a second solution. Recall that when we looked at the double root case with the second order differential equations we ran into a similar problem. In that section we simply added a  t t  to the solution and were able to get a second solution. Let’s see if the same thing will work in this case as well. We’ll see if → x = t e λ t → η x → = t e λ t η → will also be a

Differential Equations - First Order: Modeling - ii

Example 4  A 50 kg object is shot from a cannon straight up with an initial velocity of 10m/s off a bridge that is 100 meters above the ground. If air resistance is given by 5 v v  determine the velocity of the mass when it hits the ground. First, notice that when we say straight up, we really mean straight up, but in such a way that it will miss the bridge on the way back down. Here is a sketch of the situation. Notice the conventions that we set up for this problem. Since the vast majority of the motion will be in the downward direction we decided to assume that everything acting in the downward direction should be positive. Note that we also defined the “zero position” as the bridge, which makes the ground have a “position” of 100. Okay, if you think about it we actually have two situations here. The initial phase in which the mass is rising in the air and the second phase when the mass is on its way down. We will need to examine both situations and set up an IVP for